How can you look at this guy and not be enthusiastic about his candidacy! CHARLIE BROWN FOR CONGRESS!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
What morality launches a pre-emptive war, ravages the environment, awards sweetheart deals to buddies, and bankrupts working people? -- Elisabeth Gruner
About Me
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(115)
-
▼
September
(16)
- Charlie Brown vs -- Oh, wait . . .
- News Weak Pravda
- Another Reason to Vote Democratic, No Matter Your ...
- What A Great Guy!
- Guest Commercial
- Same Song Next Verse: Doolittle is Corrupt -- Very
- Note to Self: Don't Vote For Warner
- More Weirdness With John Doolittle and Bookkeeping
- Barbara Jordan on the Constitution during Watergat...
- We Can't Afford Republican Rule
- The Beginning of the End
- TPM reader to kos to *xyz to firedoglake to blogol...
- Jesus' General Explains It All For You
- Why It Matters
- For Your Research Pleasure
- Hope It's the Good Guy Flu
-
▼
September
(16)
Places to Go
- laughyerheadoff
- Sarah Orne Jewett
- Beyond Beowulf
- Ellen McCord -- wonderful artist!
- a writing godamongmen
- antiwarDOTcom
- midlife mama
- wormwood's doxy
- arachnae
- pharyngula
- a mind I admire so much
- liberal girl next door
- Betty Cracker
- Christian Bale Yum
- expat mama
- fribble's blend
- my other blog
- me singing
- indymedia
- new testament art
3 comments:
Linda, I'm delighted that you linked to your blog just now on FDL so I can FINALLY have a safe place to tell you about my (literal) standing up and cheering -- YESSSSS !!! -- when, reading along to catch up to a thread recently, I came upon your question to Kurt.
Remember that question? The one that began, "Stephanie? ... ?
Well, let me tell you, grrrl, said question was so NOTED AND APPROVED.
Also noted but ... ahem ... disapproved was that Kurt somehow unfortunately lost the power of speech just then and never did come up with an answer for you . . .
Hmmm.
Brava.
P.S. You won't be seeing me at the Lake anymore. I found out today, from Jane herself, that I've been banned "for repeatedly violating the rules of the site even after having been warned."
And, no, as a matter of fact, I don't have a clue what that means. Nor do I recommend that you ask her. Since day before yesterday, 95% of all mentions of "lotus" over there have either disappeared into moderation, never to emerge, or been retroactively scrubbed.
But good luck to you. I'm there enjoying your stuff all the time.
Huh? I am stunned by this. I truly cannot imagine what you could have written that would offend.
Yes, I remember the Stephanie question. I didn't know if anyone noticed it or agreed/disagreed with me. But I HATE that crap. So thanks for letting me know.
I'm still unnerved by your being banned. It's so odd. It HAS to be a mistake.
Nope, definitely no mistake.
Drop me a ringy-dingy at lotuslander AT cfl DOT rr DOT com, and I'll tell you more.
Post a Comment